Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27F34196F0 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gfbPlW1njo-i for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipex2.johnshopkins.edu (ipex2.johnshopkins.edu [162.129.8.151]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCEA431FC1 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:52:08 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,304,1270440000"; d="scan'208";a="326227681" Received: from c-69-255-36-229.hsd1.md.comcast.net (HELO lucky) ([69.255.36.229]) by ipex2.johnshopkins.edu with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 30 Apr 2010 14:52:08 -0400 Received: from jkr by lucky with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7vJm-0004vj-Tn; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:52:06 -0400 From: Jesse Rosenthal To: Notmuch developer list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modularize test suite In-Reply-To: <87sk6cdbxz.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <87sk6cdbxz.fsf@jhu.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3-23-g5efa9bd (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:52:06 -0400 Message-ID: <87ljc4db8p.fsf@jhu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:52:10 -0000 On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:36:56 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > Sorry the patch is so large: there was a lot of back-and-forth, and it > was hard to break the patches down into coherent steps. Carl, if you'd > prefer, I could send you a more granular, but confusing, series of > patches. Actually, due the listing of new files in the patch, the patch was so large that it got bounced pending moderation (13K, with a 12K limit). It's not actually as complicated as this size would make seem -- mainly just a lot of moving lines to individual files. Since I'm not sure who the mod is, I'll take this as a sign that I should try to break it down into smaller patches. Sorry for the delay.