Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077BB6DE0275 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngqNBfjJbhyJ for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07E46DE17F7 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 04:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zrl8T-0008Qa-QG; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:12:49 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 9905 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:12:30 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [Frederic Bonnard] Bug#803363: [PATCH] notmuch: workaround for FTBFS In-Reply-To: <8737wu6k5p.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <8737wu6k5p.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21~rc3+7~g10e933a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:12:30 -0300 Message-ID: <87ziz253oh.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:13:24 -0000 David Bremner writes: > opinions? Shall I apply this in 0.21? > Actually, there's no real rush. I can always roll this and hopefully another gdb related fix for mipsel into a point release d