Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F72431FC2 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:38:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.079 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.080, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nr2r9TGvmH29 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:38:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E48A431FC0 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:38:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1h.service.rug.nl (smtp1h.service.rug.nl [129.125.60.1]) by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M5NB9-1NyCtb40rf-00z2R3 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:38:50 -0500 Received: from marten (f5selfip-4-60.service.rug.nl [129.125.60.248]) by smtp1h.service.rug.nl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o12BcfhT008077; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:38:41 +0100 Received: by marten (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1807C2AE20F; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:38:28 +0100 (CET) From: Marten Veldthuis To: martin f krafft , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net> References: <87my083mgh.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d4148s2c.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> <4B595D3A.1030901@SSpaeth.de> <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de> <87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> <20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org> <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:38:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87iqaf50ln.fsf@marten.rgoc.rug.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.3 at smtp1h X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance (was: Git feature branch) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:38:52 -0000 On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:12 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > Arguably, being patch-centric means that a project has a higher > barrier of entry, but it also means that if someone wants something, > they know that they'll have to somehow end up with a patch. The way > this happens on Git is that you either write it yourself and bring > it up to discussion (which is what patchwork facilitates), or > constructively theorise the functionality until someone else > submits a patch. And don't forget, if you really want something on the longterm todo list, you can always send in a patch for the TODO file. ;) -- - Marten