Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1D1431FB6 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:30:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83M6fszIePys for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C99FE431FB5 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fxm8 with SMTP id 8so1134761fxm.26 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:30:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=RhnFrJZ3e70PzudMGq+ss4zgUAirPXLPZ5j69t4QIa0=; b=ruaXVXftd7f3dASJ34y9mCJYHD7MimGco47U2WTXxLcIHE/Pw0Q/YdaOJPtJaMkh9o UTlziYUF/iGAFYKDI1MRxjUa2B6Ezajy0HuTfXanR0xhAJGLNdeR/P79LD0sLq63vS0V v01OZeRixQwWoAb84CMd2SMhA7viBcLdD9E5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gRohpOzHk2IjoCi1Rj6LJcDt3Dd4M0v+SfmNP6EgXtJJSYsn1eAMGHsb9Iy9/lz59y 1a46qA0bJpjL+8TkTczK95LR1fE+u0zu0fRs5DqT4uu/C2DZC29re6VK4wvAad0cj+i2 Svyt/3kiz47kQK9z4cKBF1rI46B6IqG34SpWI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.83.3 with SMTP id d3mr526429fal.89.1304541056531; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.130 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:30:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ipz1falk.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> References: <1291933972-7186-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <87ipz1falk.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 23:30:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] composing patches From: Felipe Contreras To: Michal Sojka Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 20:30:58 -0000 Sorry for the long delay. On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Thu, 09 Dec 2010, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I don't know how it works in gnus, but at least on the vim mode, the output >> generated by 'notmuch reply' is not ready to be sent, at least the Message-ID >> field is needed, and also is nice to have the User-Agent. > > I'm not sure whether filling the message-id in notmuch is a useful > thing. With Emacs UI I often send messages which differ only in small > pieces to several people. I prepare a first version of the message and > send it, then I edit the sent message and send it once again etc. All of > these messages should have a different message-id and date headers. > > If you want to allow the UI to send a single message multiple times (and > I find it useful) then you need generate the message-id at the time of > sending and as such it has no sense to generate the headers in notmuch. Well, if you have a client that is capable of generating such a Message-Id, this patch would prevent it from doing so. This is mostly intended for dummy clients, like none at all (sendmail). -- Felipe Contreras