Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDEE431FBD for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:26:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.5 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CJ7klSalYns9 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98117431FBC for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 13:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from boo.workgroup ([87.187.157.204]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnlmV-1VeDgV42FL-00hsTa for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:26:41 +0100 Received: from grfz by boo.workgroup with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1W7XDu-0007qG-Dl; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:26:34 +0100 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:26:04 +0100 From: Gregor Zattler To: notmuch Subject: Re: Bug?: notmuch-search-show-thread shows several threads; only one containing matching messages Message-ID: <20140126212604.GC10844@boo.workgroup> Mail-Followup-To: notmuch References: <8762fzry7k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <20120126124450.GB30209@shi.workgroup> <87mx9avbc1.fsf@praet.org> <20120129234213.GB11460@shi.workgroup> <87zkd5655g.fsf@praet.org> <20120130190425.GB13521@shi.workgroup> <878vkoev95.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <20120130223416.GA26239@shi.workgroup> <874nvcekjk.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87lhy5pko1.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lhy5pko1.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: error4me@gmx.de X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Bqo8POq1o2Ibmd0MvF5cpn8wDiKw2C6Rc0TrxhDWbNP3e9dscIm gwwJPftnM6ZY/yb+vzcep6ItryzB43sFiAIOzShfNwUQ89vIwXaGXo2T/gBieWxCTNOvZ4/ uhmsdrfkhR2FtPzrUyQdV0iFzz850iMRwu5mupcfK5Bzjp97wm52bNxQtr931iertZQ9Y++ +JBC5eof52uGwcOw+UAcw== X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:26:51 -0000 Hi David, * David Bremner [24. Jan. 2014]: > Mark Walters writes: >> I have looked at this and I think this is not notmuch's fault: I think >> it is a mua doing strange things: >> >> One of the mails has an in-reply-to header which looks like >> >> In-reply-to: Message from Carsten Dominik of "Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:18:51 BST." <17242340-A14F-495A-B144-20C96D52B620@gmail.com> >> >> and I think notmuch is taking the carsten.dominik@gmail.com as message >> id. >> > > Can someone test if this is fixed by cf8aaafbad68 (i.e. does the problem > persist in git master or 0.17)? The problem is *not* fixed. I was the one who reported this problem two years ago. I did the same notmuch search again. Since I did no know if it's important with which version the emails were indexed I did a full index with notmuch 0.17+40~gecbb29e. I still have the mbox produced with notmuch show two years ago. Viewed with mutt (1) I see 206 messages in 7 threads (number of lines after collapse-all) (notmuch emacs show showed three threads then). One of the threads is the one I searched for. Today I produced another mbox with the very same command but with a now larger email corpus freshly indexed with a fresh notmuch. The mbox contains (according to mutt) 507 messages in 34 threads. One of them is the thread I searched for. I grepped for the 7 subjects within the 34 subjects and only 5 showed up. Only 17 of the 507 messages arrived since the problem report two years ago. If somebody want's to dig into this: I can provide the two mboxes. Disclaimer: Many of the emails which arrived before the problem report are not the exact same than then, because since the I mangled them with a script. This should have not changed the threading but I cannot be 100% sure. But if it's important for further investigation I'm probably able to reproduce the status quo of the email corpus then from my backups. Thanks for your persistence. Ciao, Gregor -- -... --- .-. . -.. ..--.. ...-.-