Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225F1431FC2 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:36:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t638Vjit5kBK for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD92431FC0 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2014 23:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XY85W-0001ex-NW; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 03:36:06 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 3783 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 28 Sep 2014 06:36:01 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Michal Sojka , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC] database: get and set mapping of dovecot compatible maildir keywords In-Reply-To: <87bnq0feel.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <1411805835-3563-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87iok8vog6.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <87bnq0feel.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+98~gae27403 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 08:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: <878ul4fe0e.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 06:36:17 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Michal Sojka writes: > > >> I'd prefer having the mapping stored in the config file rather than in >> the database. This would allow me to synchronize the configuration >> between multiple computers. Would there be some benefit of having the >> mapping (also) in the database? > > In retrospect, probably not that great a benefit, except I kindof > dislike the idea of putting the mess that is notmuch-config.c into the > library, so we'd likely have to deal with coming up with a clean config > file mechanism. One issue such a configuration mechanism would have to deal with that the current one does not is concurrent access by multiple clients. This is not impossible, but just another complication. d