Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BDF4196F2 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:29:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pi2LySKI9fs1 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757C4431FC1 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so122559wwb.26 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=K1elVhSX1/7x6zc9A7C0ZKdwGPMYbsgtGxFnTcJpwoE=; b=QOBXAes4/f8JW8pYfTRbujVbyWIXPDXoRtKpa0W5ZslIZAfmLWkmU9YSp9DnEgEjNM Dycszs412tUwa/salRHRIIFlm6Pgip/PlN+vWXVXrZVsPYpbh46uRyaykcdMeiaChQOT CrkzhFN3ACXVTfYVw9bQKjH7rBT6b9MOI6XrA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=P1uUDIvqUsDQdZrT1fUoCCRH9Wt6vWdOYZ7MX0Sqx1MTuplGbV075pJnoaUmzOm9h6 xRy7Fp5V0R9643cCNEc+q7B7nv7JUH+0/cee8eScFFzYz82YJTXKA0KCC/AGktICaPHF vpYvij5lf5pGuSAhzjU0eSEJQlZSoxnF0EhYw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.89.140 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87iq7u9x6y.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <874ojea0tn.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <87iq7u9x6y.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:29:41 -0400 Received: by 10.216.155.196 with SMTP id j46mr5079566wek.1.1271255381506; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: when archiving move the cursor depending on the sort order. From: Servilio Afre Puentes To: Sebastian Spaeth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:43 -0000 On 14 April 2010 05:53, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 2010-04-14, Michal Sojka wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote: >> > The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread >> > thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of >> > older-first. >> >> Is this really what we want? If I sort messages by newest first, it >> menas that I want to process my emails from the newest to the oldest. >> I'm satisfied with the current behavour. > > Agreed, I would be very surprised to get a different behavior. Hmmm, interesting. I still want to process my messages from oldest to newest but prefer them to be shown with the newest at the top. I will create and send a second version of the patch later today that takes this into account... Servilio