Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F4F40DAE9 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:57:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0m5Rq+HFOKhX; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:57:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFD940DAE3; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:57:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 030D225412B; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 09:57:17 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Felipe Contreras , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] vim improvements In-Reply-To: <1275736362-22771-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> References: <1275736362-22771-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 09:57:16 -0800 Message-ID: <87mxpjn1fn.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Bart Trojanowski X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:57:34 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 14:12:33 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > The only controversial one is the really aggressive author cleanup. I > guess the really ideal thing would be to pass the full author "Foo Bar > ", and let UI's deal with the format (possibly > configurable by the user). Yes. Personally, I'd prefer first names rather than portions of the email address. So I don't want to commit a change that takes us in the wrong direction, (giving less information to the frontends to work with). The rest of your vim patches seem totally unobjectionable to me, (but mostly only because I don't use that frontend). But I am happy to see someone hacking on it. So I'll merge these now. And since Bart didn't reply at all in all this time, Felipe, would you like access to push changes directly to the vim code? Since we're hosting that code in the notmuch repository I think we need to have an interested maintainer with the ability to maintain it, (so that future improvements don't sit idle for months). I'll send instructions for setting you up with access like that if you'd like to do that kind of maintenance. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFM2Dn86JDdNq8qSWgRAh6YAKCLgv7ikxtgpvb3NjsOLVppkT/UJACfWlzf nRQudCBebS7KVfNp6MkOXm4= =+/1x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--