Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7E3431FBF for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TeK-DaS5WlQl for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED07431FBD for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E85066E011C; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:24 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-212.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.114.212]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7199066E01AE; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 546A3506; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:19 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: David Edmondson , Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] search: Support automatic tag exclusions In-Reply-To: References: <1326258173-21163-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1326496024-14403-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1326496024-14403-4-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <87wr8tsvit.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <20120116192836.GC16740@mit.edu> <20120117203211.GQ16740@mit.edu> <877h0pqtom.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+63~g6965a07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:51:18 -0800 Message-ID: <87ty3sq1y1.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Jeremy Nickurak X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:51:25 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:52:52 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > I agree that as long as no keys are pre-bound it will make little > difference. That just transfers the discussion to the thread about > adding the bindings, which seems silly. I think that's ok. The tag exclusion is in, which is great. The next question, of whether we should setup excludes by default, is intimately related to whether or not we support key bindings to add those tags. So I think it's fine to transfer the rest of this discussion to that thread. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPFxSnAAoJEO00zqvie6q8aicP/1xoqg11rIZtc4y2Mra91h05 L4e3foTcJJ7TC/111FOwJTL7X2laHxLvLyIt19EfaVX7beaEcjtgD5p7Eh53NE7y lA8Y5V2U2p4bgHdAowTbpNupqI6SOQ8ZMW4ywFKOTwNuKX+8CD7BUwZh4nnBpfGT KctTqspi5wh6p2wDvbfWAE5kQIztmDROv9JK4YI8VU9o6xGtbcXwzX/6QwZM8RGt Ip3CyhnbFhrvDmOAIqgt5lR50c54ayvAkbXJ3IRj3yw75Yd6KlgDDmt0NOiERAGt 9JJC6m5nBPsj3wN5rsWK0oHPrOlWpdbIwcjLOwaw6Gah7TCwWbg3ZtkFI4ekCrKR m1S15kz7JmoYPeUIdEjrq639etC/5gihIkgeDvdPpzONM6VsdgMzk3gCw4P53nap vnMexXRTKJzMSjijUnaR99yZym2aELs+9lOdku55u1j2USqBqm5t5gEIvJE6OPAC ufn/+8p8nSu1nzzxyz1zGpytNB9Eza0HmY7AAWje4C/9RZq0VOgRNmcQ/F77dYnm CGHxyR48MN/zoduBTiNSx/5iKlU/lx3bZtUeSO3uJoUZlMdbVi2UfZNOLvvEyEfH EfIjtKloFKZCXf9TzHr8NLMrXf2z032DVTPPYWN1JxXjNtVd87IcCUG/2Aa2dyJ9 DFUN+3pcEYmikWtJqO9y =/tGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--