Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDE2431FB5 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:43:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4yGf3jHqo-o for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-4.MIT.EDU [18.9.25.15]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42833431FB6 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:43:15 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1209190f-b7c1dae000000a2b-f6-4d4105f2a966 Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 6B.C6.02603.2F5014D4; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:43:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id p0R5hCN2014911; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:43:13 -0500 Received: from [10.230.242.96] (169.sub-174-252-57.myvzw.com [174.252.57.169]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id p0R5h8E3018831 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:43:10 -0500 (EST) X-User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android References: <1295603977-14326-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <1295603977-14326-3-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87pqrk10wm.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87mxmn27w6.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20110126150728.GT13226@mit.edu> <87fwsfym13.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> In-Reply-To: <87fwsfym13.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during the first run From: Austin Clements Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:43:21 -0500 To: Carl Worth Message-ID: X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:43:16 -0000 Sure. I've been wanting to take a crack at notmuch new's atomicity for a while. Though you'll have to get through some of my outstanding patches. I can only keep so many branches in my head. ]:--8) rlb, you expressed an interest in solving this problem, too. Did you make any headway? "Carl Worth" wrote: >On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:07:28 -0500, Austin Clements >wrote: >> Quoth Carl Worth on Jan 26 at 9:59 pm: >> >> I believe you're right that synchronization could always be done >> eagerly. In fact, I believe this is true even with the addition of >> conjunctive and disjunctive flags. > >Excellent! Want to take a whack at implementing that? And seeing if you >can find any test cases that stress this more than existing test cases >might? > >-Carl > >-- >carl.d.worth@intel.com -- Sent from my Android. Please excuse my brevity.