Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CC5431FC0 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 08:18:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-GLkBqZQjLZ for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 08:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.24]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7B9431FBF for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 08:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0Ee41o0050xGWP851FJcz2; Sat, 10 May 2014 15:18:36 +0000 Received: from odin.tremily.us ([24.18.63.50]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0FJa1o00c152l3L3YFJbcj; Sat, 10 May 2014 15:18:36 +0000 Received: by odin.tremily.us (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EDEC211967F8; Sat, 10 May 2014 08:18:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tremily.us; s=odin; t=1399735113; bh=za8mDsHtDO29YLP/YumaUPD/VUfyprldX1wAXFMnnWI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=rNsX3e7a2igq9u6KnA47AmM9AIxY61u4N8U6i9GrtMx28ma2gd5sY/jS6vmILbN2w jJuuDJlUY9RP6G4n5CY0F1I2T9saIuXqxWUsNuXdT8Jvmwd9A/ppaxMhblU6hKknr9 twfXOC8LNWFCP4i14AVoz/fJShtx4ciQtt+dmDfU= Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 08:18:33 -0700 From: "W. Trevor King" To: Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Fix parallel build of roff files Message-ID: <20140510151833.GR28634@odin.tremily.us> References: <1397766897-14475-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xi/AxZ9U2VfEekdX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1397766897-14475-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8; url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1399735116; bh=8pOaDv5j5OF+sNo8iGOZudZTJLEY8ehPXULA9UPt1cU=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=vOaCwpjmPNsurCPOuoxFA0iZP+FNW1wT8MxkNYUxWpue7rcnt2+JcXJ3/qHZTyvl4 jFV0BGWIyfkpDMOQms/kLNtydo2PxRWIO1Ssrjc9pi7NMeoJX5pAl0/c1QwwO4se5O DJ+aehfSKSoPqwzrCGAMcDBiJYZkUmYh3OK4AYhOAZASLm7cFRHqZL2Wuzly1afXIO gyid6JMAGsNZrGQ14JJ+U8LYTFQb4Iav8XAhqouQIXPSlHelF5UHnY6H9Fj5N/vfp1 UqMSIVqycjo+bx3aG/xZfiuq6vykIlLpeKk5UbP15ebbVA7DsXLiziTgQCPBEbHYFK 3wxuq+u1BTYVQ== Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 15:18:45 -0000 --xi/AxZ9U2VfEekdX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 04:34:57PM -0400, Austin Clements wrote: > +$(DOCBUILDDIR)/.roff.stamp: ${MAN_RST_FILES} > ifeq ($(HAVE_SPHINX),1) > $(SPHINXBUILD) -b man $(ALLSPHINXOPTS) $(DOCBUILDDIR)/man > for section in 1 5 7; do \ > @@ -48,6 +54,7 @@ else > @echo "Fatal: build dependency fail." > @false > endif > + touch ${MAN_ROFF_FILES} $@ I'm poking around in the Makefile, and don't understand why we're touching ${MAN_ROFF_FILES} here. Either they were just created by Sphinx/rst2man, or we died with the @false. I doubt Sphinx or prerst2man.py are intelligent enough to not clobber the roff files if their content hasn't changed, but I don't see a point in explicitly bumping timestamps either. I think I'll drop the ${MAN_ROFF_FILES} as part of the patch I'm working on, but let me know if I'm just missing something. Cheers, Trevor --=20 This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy --xi/AxZ9U2VfEekdX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTbkNGAAoJEKKfehoaNkbtLPMP/0YksUEaIFoUAdyTbh3iTSKz OpUNdned/u+hyVLto8uU5/OzXCHCmS987k/nzz2TlxdRTs9JEuGNeSR6b5K6CVWp GC2DZOGWBwUcpbyBc2LW1lLeFZdYc+MAYL6h6s5QuNwqL7TufWZEacr8Jw+tX1N2 S0lHxd5Hj8H5QxxaMYy/MjscVdO09RKreW7w2LpZgYtIGXCmAtrZo3Ktm11gU2hJ AGeE4Z11+D3Ze97Z6SlEtXiO1c1FACwwdVaFAlApysPPwd9tK34ueZ7qhhk4iSsc /PaQmmbWDhPgEOt+hFTZuFqmHAJje8OVPkBRT6I6d21/XigvE7AyDRpRQrBmywVp X0nBnRSMMssCiCrFI8hhkrynETQWOBROdDTrV7ehSNEerQAATEw7Sc2jFjui6akD K8VpURUL7ppBLzhG2sZ5Hc6vE2Uj4mLW0WmTbAsjel6VRJRyFsudDfrcX5Zvh2Q6 CYSFg/vIUaqWYM3xfpxPob1AGuvV38OAtt0g65KPShli4b0Z32/TrUUGEACVTGRP Yd6j/t3AD6om13Gfe/VaEwKIjQ6Ccs4d6dI1JEe1YMtEysnfb2Xe7l8pg+J8SA/u 1TabxD+aVvbXg/6zZ80gI8ezsPDRCUsmZnV1Oqq3MHhVCuTuky0+d+rUqkCA6jTO TFHXK3LMZnTfvyIOSeao =9M7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xi/AxZ9U2VfEekdX--