Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 16:13:25 +0100
From: Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: change "#!/bin/bash" to "#!/usr/bin/env bash"
	enhances portability
Message-ID: <20101202151325.GI1775@blackspot>
References: <1291235272-16335-1-git-send-email-joel.borggren.franck@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gTY1JhLGodeuSBqf"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To:
 <1291235272-16335-1-git-send-email-joel.borggren.franck@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Precedence: list


--gTY1JhLGodeuSBqf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 21:27, Wed 01 Dec 10, Joel Borggr=E9n-Franck wrote:
> From: Joel Borggr=E9n-Franck <jbf@codehouse.se>
>=20
> Change #!/bin/bash at start of tests to "#!/usr/bin/env bash". That way
> systems running on bash < 4 can prepend bash >=3D 4 to path before
> running the tests.

Is there any reason to use bash? Is the test system dependent to any key fe=
ature
of bash?

Not every system has bash installed. To have a dependency on bash just for
development I think is not a big issue. But if it don't requires any big ef=
fort
I think will be better to have it more generic.


--=20
Rub=E9n Poll=E1n  | jabber:meskio@jabber.org
-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=
=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-
Nos vamos a Croatan.

--gTY1JhLGodeuSBqf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkz3t5UACgkQGKOQ92SwNMJ30gCfTC0mkrpZWtMzuPs54GYuPEkT
vOQAnj3Lns4zkcQGv2oQhIKAKy7GFyJK
=8b/X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gTY1JhLGodeuSBqf--