Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FF9431FBF for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:33:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gqRTti5GNLpW for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903CC431FBD for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WaA38-00042H-JS; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:33:46 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 28076 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:33:41 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: [PATCH] nmbug: mark repository as bare on clone In-Reply-To: <20140415172319.GJ21805@odin.tremily.us> References: <1397320232-32458-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <20140415172319.GJ21805@odin.tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+180~g8977b1a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 17:33:41 -0300 Message-ID: <87bnw2wcwq.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:33:58 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > Still, these are just quibbles with the commit message. I'm +1 on the > code change. My initial bare-resistance [2] was because I didn't > realize that an explicit GIT_WORK_TREE would override the core.bare > setting. OK, pushed with an amended commit message/ d