Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1B431FBD for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qgHu2+Cpxj8M for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01F99431FAF for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ro8so2432653pbb.18 for ; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yw6jyLo4T2qD9BVoK5vTGA7MbZRztmxMk/xN4JbaQhc=; b=uVXkRGa3fw0MlQtFGHhbUE43WFbtGoesRYX3bq2MeeL6Ilde9Bwyw+Dv9oby2iW0mc 4Hjq5Ohb8p592zdotM7HzQ15fA9WqT0KveT0hR603fRvdx2xZB75w6Rqodo93Ty+WRMP awVxOkVd1Z6U+lS5P6PVjo1mac8N21eIFPWNV2Wsz+qRbmsPry7PMuFQGM0ivI/Bodg7 npRvol6pISOEDxowm/FauztuvbaZh0Lnebloc/AycmHzEiRlCz9qaIF5YP7MHKOkkCaP ZPL3UGeyjz08EMpv2xM5FazJ2mv/L7+GB04tj52NrxGeBq1XjKcCsWuEsESkFV6ZGkW3 d4tg== X-Received: by 10.66.4.193 with SMTP id m1mr25243093pam.214.1362272871134; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rr14sm17045838pbb.34.2013.03.02.17.07.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Mar 2013 17:07:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:07:45 +1100 Message-ID: <20130303120745.GA4884@hili.localdomain> From: Peter Wang To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] cli: support Mail-Followup-To: in notmuch reply In-Reply-To: References: <5eaa3acc22ee5513bdce5ab931b7a79ade880e06.1362254104.git.jani@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 01:07:52 -0000 On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:55:21 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Use Mail-Followup-To header to determine recipients according to > http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html if configured and present in the > message being replied to. I would like to see an option to --reply-to=list that, as far as possible, does the right thing. If we had that, do we need reply.honor_followup_to? Peter