From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,
	Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages
In-Reply-To: <877hnxhs3v.fsf@jhu.edu>
References: <87pr3iygrx.fsf@jhu.edu> <87y6gfojvf.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87sk6lm3eb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <877hnxhs3v.fsf@jhu.edu>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-188-g9757095 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:36:13 -0700
Message-ID: <87d3xoh6sy.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=2D-=20
carl.d.worth@intel.com
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:56:04 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu> wr=
ote:
> I'd love to put this into shape to become part of notmuch proper.=20

Great!

> My question, for this and other things I've worked on, is where code
> that targets message-mode should go. In notmuch-mua.el? Or a new
> notmuch-message-utils.el? Or just a catch-all notmuch-utils.el? Once I
> know where it would make the most sense to group these, I'll submit a
> patch.

You can call it notmuch-message.el if you'd like.

I'm never a fan of something generic like -utils. Things like that seem
to grow without bounds.

> But just to clarify: you don't mind if removal is a customizable user
> option, right?

I don't mind at all. I was just happy to realize that we wouldn't have
to do any tag removal to make the feature useful out-of-the-box.

=2DCarl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFL02RN6JDdNq8qSWgRAs/kAJ4nwzcpNq3Tutsx9hFQKusYF2WbbQCggdPi
eG0/H2fkVjNTj2uatG44a/g=
=ZjiV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--