Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0172C431FAE for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:58:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6aYSE1gx5JZ for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08B9D431FAF for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r10so5393701lbi.15 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xtRpzC0rcGqY+vqVrs77unhRdCQEKgmduZCZm+mHmDg=; b=k3bT5RLjuzhSlcVkO7D/yB36GWA/i2ro8rfBLVWryUvfjnJ0XMjc67Q1Fhro+bXFDx A/sTfzBSHrCf00AYe7mhmlu0ty9ExOPoDmXBMHqPE7mVHCw1HplqBwkdXAwHAewSMXZc ozytKtLs7GIO1B9cNVeQU2M8LIduqeQXsjnrWKbvo3HvWeGZo56+X7LfDvuAGYfbnc2l nz98mxkOcqO8o2FClZD5qG4XTzGx8HNElQDL6QS+Ss3ziiFQgf3ABRozNYFW/I3RY9LM Sle3STblqcpQqTmnFcZl/hw0LARdVKVgucllaJpXJ6/gEYY8kb3nQKZDIcgoV1m0vhk1 6P1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.154.98 with SMTP id vn2mr25899815lbb.8.1367258276851; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:57:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet> <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet> <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:57:56 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings From: Felipe Contreras To: David Bremner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Carl Worth X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:58:05 -0000 On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:38 AM, David Bremner wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: >> >> I don't take it personally, I just don't see why a part of the project >> has to be treated differently because you (the debian packager), don't >> want to setup a separate git repo where to have this 'live' packaging >> (or even a separate branch). >> > > My hypothetical laziness is not the reason. It was at the strong > insistence of Carl that things are organized this way. I still don't see why we need to do that. The notmuch project shouldn't be bound to the debian project. -- Felipe Contreras