Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D30429E25 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:04:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAiDbbTf+8FU for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A76B431FD0 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id pALB4IG7018294; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:04:19 +0200 From: Tomi Ollila To: Thomas Schwinge , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump: Don't sort. In-Reply-To: <87r51ab36z.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <1319884657-5574-1-git-send-email-thomas@schwinge.name> <87r51ab36z.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10~rc1+16~gc832dad (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:04:27 -0000 On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:10:44 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 12:37:37 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > From: Thomas Schwinge > > > > This improves usage experience considerably in the given scenario. > > > > I'm not sure if I mentioned this only in IRC, so let me recap. > > Personally, I think this needs more information in the commit message, > and (optionally) less in the comment. I would prefer to be able to > understand what is going on just from the output of git log. I agree; the git commit message: --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<-- dump: Don't sort. This improves usage experience considerably in the given scenario. --8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<----8<-- Is not very informative. Better to describe the given scenario in commit message and (perhaps!) tune the comment in the code. We've seen that the patch is very useful -- So, Thomas, please provide a patch in a format it can be comfortably added to the repository :). > > d Tomi