DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
	content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=HS/qw8wFsfo6RjLWPQ2Eiw5sOAf
	ac5cJKbWm/S+ppD5vMu+duNLqXnhHd6FMJAQ6vwU7aNsdyBBC2Z0ZbMCu07tO918
	MzwTpkzfZj3Z+WiLiIbi7a/JL+8Y3cRtnVbG05QWfI3eAeHXcshzanzc8p13/a0x
	Rf61etH2B+MVDt2w=
From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
	notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: PGP/MIME signature verification
In-Reply-To: <4D10C97C.7060602@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>
	<87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87zkrz314j.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <4D10C97C.7060602@fifthhorseman.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-58-g9741d28 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:38:02 +0100
Message-ID: <87mxnx3mb9.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list

> yes, the branch as it stands just concerns itself with the notmuch binary.

OK, fair enough.

> > "sigstatus": [{"status": "error","keyid": "ED34CEABE27BAABC", "errors":
> > 2}]
> > (perhaps due to me not having your key???)
> 
> yup, that is why you get that error.

Is there a possibility to squeeze a nicer error message out of it? :-)

> > is ok but:
> > notmuch show --verify id:"87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net"
> > 
> > neither omplains nor shows anything in addition. Should it do one of the
> > two?
> 
> the patch is specifically only for the json output.  If you'd like the
> same features for the non-json output, that would be cool to see, but i
> don't understand those formats well enough to know how to incude that
> kind of info in them.

No problem, I was just wondering about it simply silently ignoring an
option (in plain output), but that is fine for now.
 
> If this seems like i've only done one small corner of the task needed to
> get signature verification: you're right!

NONONO :) Don't misunderestimate me. This is phantastic work!!!

You got the really hard part working, which is great. The rest is sugar
on top :). Much appreciated and another:

Tested-and-approved-and-+1for_merging: S. Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>

Sebastian