Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE86431FAF for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nn6MLhqnaIQi for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4F431FAE for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AA22E50E81; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:14:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (unknown [70.42.157.22]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ADC2E50E85; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A1E2445; Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Adam Wolfe Gordon , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] Reply enhancements In-Reply-To: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> References: <1331525142-30539-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+306~g05d342c (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:13:08 -0700 Message-ID: <8762e3dosb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:14:08 -0000 --=-=-= On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:05:32 -0600, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: > * I noticed that reply supports a --decrypt option, and the emacs interface > actually does use it. I've documented the option in the reply man page. > If someone can test that replying to encrypted messages actually works in > emacs, that would be great - I have no way to test this. The test suite actually includes a test for replying to encrypted messages (see crypto: "reply to encrypted message"). That test should run as long as gnupg is available on the test system, and if it passes you should be good to go. But in any event I have tested this patch set, including the decryption option, and it all looks good to me. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPZOJEAAoJEO00zqvie6q8vJMP/0Fm4ILUwTEidfjiDR+SdD+i QuL6MyZt4OZuRAKWFNOJtojMg+Y0CbIq5DvuW/UpYLZilVUEDqhzKLuuWQiJtssZ eM+mkdH/baOw+fMeo6KAbDv6NpejXwA/WDcU+T6dD+Y3xAHn+OeLoRUnm612FVzm IYkCVRV9chSb/7o1VrlE/IBk2p99JaQ0vaZWYcgrD6Wo30CLt0Xzhgjy9hPlH61C W0izlwxHj0E0vjpIsjReid+jZQeHZ2NxS2c65rm9f9wGvlzy9dBDcNi9BS91aVMj SoJkFQn9cagbJ77Zbn/haLHJDi2l5+F2xRFTdAHE8h+uYFoxDe9rCq7oVTFqChqC h2tLPe2HaaoVCpsG2JnZ4IuoWg6C7Gmc55E6UTNm8au6wBMhrF1b8OHYMJAhQNgn LiU+m/xjCuZwubMEdWMtOnpH6iuQOOgPVSHBMrUppz6TmMhH17eJyqUT7VcwGivh YqblXPRJfYyo1w+BtJiTLgJsYbWELuT45NqrfP5fTre365sWWG7lYFxchc/+cEl/ /FFx4eOMCVLEaoinm4DTMHTwZqpfJJjOIiyDVDvR180r2E3HCXxHqOP6fTnczoy8 RVcE1M6o+Q4qWf0Oou1Ojc7tAX6Y+FVK1FSuMl9fgjSFTfym9qM8paC3bY+x8gWx 4z5sqmb0+/2hCp8s8EP+ =EBmf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--