Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A495431FBD; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:05:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLB2Vau6Cqjp; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C12431FAE; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D8D32542FB; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 15:05:33 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Ingmar Vanhassel , notmuch In-Reply-To: <1260003220-sup-349@cannonball> References: <1259452657-27608-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87ocmee0sg.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20091205002050.GA26479@finestructure.net> <878wdidyqv.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <1260003220-sup-349@cannonball> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:05:32 -0800 Message-ID: <87ws11c98j.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 1/3] fix configure script to handle --prefix= and properly create Makefile.config X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 23:05:34 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:59:12 +0100, Ingmar Vanhassel w= rote: > Excerpts from Carl Worth's message of Sat Dec 05 01:56:56 +0100 2009: > > Cool. At least not everyone thinks I'm crazy then. That's > > encouraging. :-) >=20 > I'm not convinced that re-implementing lots of things that autoconf > already handles properly & portably is the better route to go. It's > purely a waste of time. Hence, I'll be happy to send patches to use > autoconf, if you change your mind on the subject. Let's test it. If you could write a patch to replace our current configure script with something based on autoconf, then I'll be glad to try it out and see what I think. If there are any differences that I find annoying, then we can see which of those we can work around or get fixed in upstream autoconf. I'm definitely open to exploration in this area. > Now when you say you hate automake & libtool, then I'll wholeheartedly > agree with you. Hate is one emotion that I do my best to avoid. But I am quite glad to have found no compelling reason to use either automake or libtool so far in notmuch. :-) =2DCarl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLGuc96JDdNq8qSWgRAgh3AKCMgkGktJOCPQta6pBOBOx07EfnlgCgjh9i 85QwQTAEYxogC/gQMC3/ttA= =Suy8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--