Return-Path: <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE6E431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Mar 2010 23:15:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.492
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[AWL=-0.382, BAYES_05=-1.11] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id m6rejaIsBX8T for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue,  2 Mar 2010 23:15:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55AD431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  2 Mar 2010 23:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4])
	by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0097E19F33DE;
	Wed,  3 Mar 2010 08:14:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS
Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1])
	by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10044)
	with ESMTP id 4GU0E5yl6NJw; Wed,  3 Mar 2010 08:14:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34])
	by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DAB19F35E7;
	Wed,  3 Mar 2010 08:14:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from steelpick.localdomain (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30])
	(Authenticated sender: sojkam1)
	by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6572FA004;
	Wed,  3 Mar 2010 08:14:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wsh by steelpick.localdomain with local (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>)
	id 1NminB-0005a7-6h; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:14:49 +0100
From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>, Sebastian Spaeth
	<Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
In-Reply-To: <20100302140158.GE31643@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
References: <1267533462-15682-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
	<20100302140158.GE31643@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:14:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87635dg9li.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-reply: Use a shorter 'On,
 X Y wrote:' line
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:15:01 -0000

On Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:01:58 +0100, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
> also sprach Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> [2010.03.02.1337 +0100]:
> > Previously, we would output: 'On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:32:54 +0100,
> > Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:' now it is: 'On
> > 2010-02-25, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:'
> > 
> > In case we don't find a '<' (as indicator for 'Realname <email>'),
> > we still use the whole from address.
> 
> This makes me cringe. I don't think replying should be
> notmuch-functionality in the first place.

Hi,

I also see it a little bit strange to have reply in notmuch, but I don't
care if it works (which is unfortunately not the case, see my next
mail). You needn't use it if your MUA provides a different way of
replying.

There is indeed one interesting functionality in notmuch reply -
replying to multiple messages based on a search term. Currently it is a
little bit rough, but I can imagine I could use it some day.

Bye
Michal