Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E51431FBD for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XhO-qSdadtJs for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E1E431FBC for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 05:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X6IVH-0006lP-T8; Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:03:39 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 5612 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 13 Jul 2014 12:03:36 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , "W. Trevor King" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] rst2man.py support and doc-build cleanups In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+29~gb5327d4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 09:03:36 -0300 Message-ID: <8761j1h3dz.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 12:03:51 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > > The series now looks good to me, I don't have time to test it now but will > do it after Jul 20th. > > I am satisfied with rst-man2any.py, but as being normal picky me I wonder > whether the command prefix 'rst-' is being too generic i.e. is invading > that "namespace". If no one else has the same feeling (or the feeling is > just wrong (or insignificant)) then this can be forgotten :D I would not worry too much about the name of a private command used in the build process. d