Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B15431FCF for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:12:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xS++b+uWG5sz for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A92F431FAE for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:12:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XlmL5-0007L2-QJ; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:12:35 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 406 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:12:30 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Michal Sojka , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] cli: Introduce "notmuch address" command In-Reply-To: <871tpimxt8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> References: <1415058622-21162-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <1415058622-21162-7-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87d293mp9c.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <871tpimxt8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.2+156~g3cc8ed5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 23:12:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87sihyfwdt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 22:12:44 -0000 Michal Sojka writes: >> Similarly for excludes. I'm ok with the duplication for now, and I can >> see an argument for not making the user chase references. > > What about using RST include directive [1] to include shared parts into > more documents? > > [1] http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#including-an-external-document-fragment Probably a good idea, but let's leave it until after 0.19 to deal with the ensuing storm of "This doesn't work on my PDP-11/70 running RSX/11" type complaints. d