Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC238431FD2 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n+FPLyF6b5RL for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385CE431FBC for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6D5328068; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:29 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75BA2E5075A; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 426012CE; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:23 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: David Edmondson , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Emacs: Crypto: How to get automatic encryption? In-Reply-To: References: <87pqejj5nl.fsf@marcos.anarcat.ath.cx> <87ehuo7pjr.fsf@algae.riseup.net> <87ehuoljzs.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+115~g51d071f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:19 -0800 Message-ID: <87liow6slg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:26:32 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:01 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > Can you explain the logic that will apply to determine whether or not a > reply is encrypted? My plan was to modify notmuch-reply.c to include a flag in the JSON output if the message being replied to was encrypted. The emacs reply function could then look for that flag and add the ml-secure directive to encrypt the reply. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPH8q7AAoJEO00zqvie6q8WakQAKGFVZ2XGMu8MdrQVM+/VqXN NTUpStZ9/TDcvinu2v6jVJuYMRRdLLMVr25/s0vV7MYv9xhQO7SymLpeNu0qRGuF o543rkZAkpiipZZASzdtY9HNVWk6j1M9eL8V39fOz3VHIrQbiChBiz5ayE3PieyA jxNa5zk8KWIIcAUbmAiDGAU8cwJ3LmnUOnj+oJMIDcXCinTNkI0uasTAsWCJt0d3 D8ueoEVMhFJdkfUge0PGk4HXAUqZEkfCI43AZRT90Yk8l4cR9UebZ7w1ZAdSORgt af51uEvdmtjUs2hcV+T380DKlGKoesOHkqXid+s6xJODIu35Mamx2jN5IBbSKVAd Lu1jOIadoMFKHbx0oQnTtc54xdMrbsBzjlwcXvHi6743/0xo3u9iW6a5EqYyVqdi YQoc0YEx3f1AzGSC5shAj9SfCNNj1m4mPYhNf7VQGzqJMZua4iGA9H0U6JOt8qsJ J9MweooZnufh+RjJGE1HEP6hTffp3UMviq7ehFihMD5sYf7gs25+uIUrT/3S2yCf zpR73QcYyWpcqwxiBjKwT7WR7NctOAopL7Q8h+5os5BUiAyYrFiq11REWd+4xjdj beqSMMORAbfRkFA7QWnzLYkOJ2pzp8ais56CAhJi9+BtzRWmV/60twt3ShMfBXZ2 9hp0w8inl+UVZQFMvHSV =y8CX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--