Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B014196F2 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:06:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.49 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wEH4pMh8U7SP for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4800D431FC1 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:06:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com [72.227.128.66]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3M56psT029385 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:06:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O4ocl-00073o-5h; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:06:51 -0400 From: Jameson Rollins To: Dirk Hohndel , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add 'd'elete keybinding to search and show views In-Reply-To: References: <1271891763-10757-1-git-send-email-hohndel@infradead.org> <1271891763-10757-2-git-send-email-hohndel@infradead.org> <87y6ggmlew.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:06:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87vdbk849k.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:06:59 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:20:41 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Well, that would take away a big reason for adding this - > convenience. In the end it's user experience design. The question is > (based on expected behavior) - do you expect a deleted email to stay > visible in your inbox. I don't - and I know that many people do. I actually have my default "inbox" set to be the search "tag:inbox and not tag:delete", so it's true that in general I don't usually want to see the deleted messages. However, I think the right solution is to have the default view be "inbox and not deleted", instead of using the delete key to remove inbox tags. I just feel like I want to have fine-grained control over tagging. By the same token, I don't want hitting the space bar to archive messages when all I really want to do is advance to the next message. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLz9lnAAoJEO00zqvie6q8t9YP/1xL+nnJPHpeD9/B1D8Pfp87 ZMvx+ZZA5Ckjhhw6OwlGCs8cft0EA2GNvv1x7+E6AvJ2OQvN1xpHUXJooKei0CGM nQOIkNTC+zrPa3lcHulucmNd/bcvnmrDGpfg6hvZnJJifk93GK6d2EFMhuJOdIrR RU42VMTSaNyUprwox7Y3zNJRKUBsWb4h+BwNXqxYw4NU1SFh4dQk/iZ4MKEyAvzU XfKgrkp6H3zcO5lNJkPaxdGaccGXLNJu4rMQ6jWaQl/6ncQIqzp6uUONg5SGXCjV jI64nSbARoRihAmgxXgOzIPq3qxm9YF26Xv8GffMUlEwmMm6iiXk7cygBtkqWl3V 48N76OshGWospMKaDoyvVtk9WRXceh5GznHH1u0jQH6JhSrFKwEg9mrLfxXjF6e1 K27pEGaAd8OvVaeDiSD3uqUujIJmDSbEBURW0Iyy/HYItfjmu1fUeGImQaFE3hbf E/DZ5eocOYA8xkLqSFKsfYdRL8Pe9rwdmZ61CsYxOtX+cfTHrL3luPEIRcbSDf60 TPBVt9PbDuJHgt1ZlyIItzpYiq60catF04ObyDDlXha8dd6DZVd9PrMEWMaXasd5 +6fpigQ57cPfrmJZz4s/zogm4Lre1F03YiS4GhucUWSefEfRIaUX99ZGaTViVYVa gU7ETRq6HMwu2hSw4gCU =cG3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--