Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8175F4196F2 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:35:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzXDSmVi540Q for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7D8431FC1 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 01:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.4]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75B219F33CB; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP AMAVIS Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1]) by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10044) with ESMTP id TAQvzTopBREl; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D1519F330D; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from steelpick.2x.cz (k335-30.felk.cvut.cz [147.32.86.30]) (Authenticated sender: sojkam1) by imap.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16594FA003; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O1y4K-0003bt-Ui; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:32 +0200 From: Michal Sojka To: Servilio Afre Puentes , notmuch Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: when archiving move the cursor depending on the sort order. In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:35:32 +0200 Message-ID: <874ojea0tn.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:35:36 -0000 On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote: > The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread > thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of > older-first. Is this really what we want? If I sort messages by newest first, it menas that I want to process my emails from the newest to the oldest. I'm satisfied with the current behavour. -Michal