From: Mark Walters <markwalters1009@gmail.com>
To: david@tethera.net, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 11/17] test: add test for notmuch tag --batch option
In-Reply-To: <1353792017-31459-12-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
References: <1353792017-31459-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
	<1353792017-31459-12-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+81~g9730584 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:50:22 +0000
Message-ID: <87pq31i9g1.fsf@qmul.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list


Hi

On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, david@tethera.net wrote:
> From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
>
> Basic test of functionality, along with all combinations of options.
> ---
>  test/tagging |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/test/tagging b/test/tagging
> index 980ff92..e5b8315 100755
> --- a/test/tagging
> +++ b/test/tagging
> @@ -46,6 +46,52 @@ test_expect_equal "$output" "\
>  thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; One (:\"  inbox tag1 unread)
>  thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Two (inbox tag1 tag4 unread)"
>  
> +test_begin_subtest "--batch"
> +notmuch tag --batch <<EOF
> +# %20 is a space in tag
> +-:"%20 -tag1 +tag5 +tag6 -- One
> ++tag1 -tag1 -tag4 +tag4 -- Two
> +-tag6 One
> ++tag5 Two
> +EOF
> +output=$(notmuch search \* | notmuch_search_sanitize)
> +test_expect_equal "$output" "\
> +thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; One (inbox tag5 unread)
> +thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Two (inbox tag4 tag5 unread)"
> +
> +> batch.in  <<EOF
> +# %20 is a space in tag
> +-:"%20 -tag1 +tag5 +tag6 -- One
> ++tag1 -tag1 -tag4 +tag4 -- Two
> +-tag6 One
> ++tag5 Two
> +EOF
> +
> +test_begin_subtest "--input"
> +notmuch tag --input=batch.in
> +output=$(notmuch search \* | notmuch_search_sanitize)
> +test_expect_equal "$output" "\
> +thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; One (inbox tag5 unread)
> +thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Two (inbox tag4 tag5 unread)"

Wouldn't a different set of tag changes be a better test as presumably
this test can pass if the command just does nothing? 

Mark

> +
> +test_begin_subtest "--batch --input"
> +notmuch tag --batch --input=batch.in
> +output=$(notmuch search \* | notmuch_search_sanitize)
> +test_expect_equal "$output" "\
> +thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; One (inbox tag5 unread)
> +thread:XXX   2001-01-05 [1/1] Notmuch Test Suite; Two (inbox tag4 tag5 unread)"
> +
> +test_begin_subtest "--batch, blank lines and comments"
> +notmuch dump | sort > EXPECTED.$test_count
> +notmuch tag --batch <<EOF
> +# this line is a comment; the next has only white space
> + 	 
> +
> +# the previous line is empty
> +EOF
> +notmuch dump | sort > OUTPUT.$test_count
> +test_expect_equal_file EXPECTED.$test_count OUTPUT.$test_count
> +
>  test_expect_code 1 "Empty tag names" 'notmuch tag + One'
>  
>  test_expect_code 1 "Tag name beginning with -" 'notmuch tag +- One'
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch@notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch