Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B54431FB6 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 05:46:53 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o6Sna2PUtp7z for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 05:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CB7431FAF for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 05:46:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TwYl1-0006Af-Tg; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:46:52 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TwYkw-0003zc-7T; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:46:46 -0400 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: the future of notmuch-vim? User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 09:46:27 -0400 Message-ID: <871udhcmks.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 13:46:53 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So now that we've (finally) released, we can turn our minds back to being distruptive. I'm not sure what, if anything to do about the vim frontend. Looking at=20 http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=3Dnotmuch There is apparently still some people that use it (although notice the "Vote" column is 0). On the other hand =2D The vim frontend is afaik the last thing depending on the legacy text output format. =2D The plugin seems to be only semi-functional at the moment; in a quick test I found a message that didn't display it's content, and one that displayed the content, along with "junk" from the internal representation. =2D There are now several alternatives for people whose only motivation to use the vim frontend was dislike of emacs (alot and notmuch-mutt). There are several alternative vim frontends floating around in (at least) ruby and python. I don't if they are better or worse functionality wise.=20 I'm considering stopping building debian packages for notmuch-vim, since I don't see any current prospects for the package improving. I'm not sure what the equivalent thing to do upstream would be, perhaps moving it to contrib. Or, deprecating it and then removing it. What do people think? d --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAlD6o7QACgkQTiiN/0Um85mlMAP+LS3gHyl48xwCLxJxLy7FlO2g 1yNkO82MZyN6yesG+WVn3yM6UU+5p41gMCBV1cIUlXGryVqa/yTUKJxwk3hIKlRH agVdIHfmoyMG5uZLPBMLgoHFnwohIH4A6GABaV/JTuZNp/kVGegTmwfXUJc2Z/yB TErV48hIKARoMPELR/U= =iwTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--