From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add customization group for replying
In-Reply-To: <87vcfu2qap.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
References: <1343311113-22171-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
	<87vcfu2qap.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+11~gd9bf007 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:13:34 +0300
Message-ID: <m2ligqnoap.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list

On Tue, Sep 04 2012, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 26 2012, Michal Sojka wrote:
>> When one wants to customize the format of reply message, there nothing
>> to tell the user how to do it.  Without knowing that construction of
>> reply buffer is actually implemented in the message package, it seems
>> that replying cannot be customized.
>>
>> Because I was getting annoyed by the empty line the between citation
>> line and the quoted message, I figured out that changing this is fairly
>> easy when one knows what to customize.
>>
>> This patch adds notmuch-reply customization group that that contains
>> references to the relevant customization options. The new group is easy
>> to find as it is shown as a result of running "M-x customize-group RET
>> notmuch RET".
>
> Ping.
>
> Any objections against applying?

Nobody dares to say anything due to infamiliriaty of this spesific case ;/.

I could not find any reference this has been made before.

I could not find any discussion about this issue.

With little effort I could not extract the customization tree to
stdout I could have attempted to grep whether there is same variable
in many groups.

The code in custom.el & cus-edit.el is so complex I could not figure
out whether there is any problems having variable in many groups
(put apparently the changed variable is not written twice to the
customization block).

I do like the feature but with this knowledge I have I just cannot 
promote applying (I sure am not against :)

> -Michal

Tomi