Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76179431FC3 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:25:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.38 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.38 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1=0.001, HELO_NO_DOMAIN=1, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.379] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EZ2cAdbJJdBf for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server (static-212-101-19-163.adsl.solnet.ch [212.101.19.163]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E579E431FAF for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcbe15117.cern.ch.belohrad.ch (beesknees.cern.ch [137.138.197.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 623FD25C81; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:33:23 +0200 (CEST) From: David Belohrad To: Subject: miraculous from: field User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+47~ga7bc1c7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:25:28 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:25:33 -0000 Dear All, could someone give a hint? I have an opened mail message. When I press 'r' to reply, a new mail buffer is opened and the 'From' field is correctly filled with 'david@belohrad.ch'. When on the same message I press however 'f' to forward the message, new buffer opens, but this time the 'From' field contains incorrectly 'belohrad@bepc12494.cern.ch', which is clearly a composite of my login name and FQHN. Why that difference and what can I do to mitigate this? thanks david