Return-Path: <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C96431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ppkLePqdTFYU for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E9D431FB5
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A400B90D35;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:17:06 -0600 (CST)
Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7])
	by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665895010C;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 (CST)
Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 57ED37BA375; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 (CST)
From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
To: Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support
References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net>
	<87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<87d3mdvjwz.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info> <87k4gk70ng.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<87sjv8i7v6.fsf@irigaray.ross.mayfirst.org>
	<87sjv86mp9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<4D6BF0AA.3070706@fifthhorseman.net>
	<874o7o6ih5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<4D6C00C7.9000705@fifthhorseman.net>
	<8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600
In-Reply-To: <8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> (Jameson Rollins's
	message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:19 -0800")
Message-ID: <87hbbno7ia.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:16:40 -0000

Jameson Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> writes:

> If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't
> themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm
> inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name.

Are persistent tags required here?  The original question at least,
seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has
encrypted or signed bits.  So I wondered if that might be accomplished
without actual tags.

Just curious.
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4