Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E68540DAC6 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:44:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eDM8Z3iPyPuL for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from canuck.infradead.org (canuck.infradead.org [134.117.69.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC99B40DBD2 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:43:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=x201s.gr8dns.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PGig7-0001xa-2i; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:43:47 +0000 Received: by x201s.gr8dns.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4F0223E0D02; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:43:46 -0800 (PST) From: Dirk Hohndel To: Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Maildir-flags synchronization now on master branch In-Reply-To: <87zktfmkvy.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87iq04nh8v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87zktfmkvy.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.4-20-gaf4d112 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:43:46 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:44:00 -0000 On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:43:45 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > > Now that all of this maildir-flag synchronization is possible, I wonder > if we shouldn't allow the user to configure the mapping of maildir-flag > characters to tag names. That would allow for (a limited number of) tags > to be synchronized on multiple machines using synchronization mechanisms > such as offlineimap without needing any notmuch-aware synchronization. > > So that might be very interesting. Oh I LOVE that idea. There are only a small number of tags that I /really/ need and to be able to access them from multiplme machines, kept in sync through the imap server... awesome. /D