Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5696DE00DD for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 05:23:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.315 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.315 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.236, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jMpQLEnN5iKb for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 05:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ECDB6DE005F for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 05:23:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a7NfC-0008T3-Fx; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:23:10 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 6688 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:23:09 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , notmuch mailing list Subject: Re: debian build-dependencies for testing should be marked In-Reply-To: <87zixiwlmu.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87io47ny9b.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87zixiwlmu.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+7~g55fb7da (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:23:09 -0400 Message-ID: <874mfpf7b6.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:23:19 -0000 David Bremner writes: > > Daniel and I chatted a bit on IRC, but for the record, other than lack > of time, my current concern about this is how well supported > build-profiles are supported on Debian stable. I haven't researched > this, but feedback is welcome. > I was updating the smime series, and I decided to try it out. Build profiles seem to work in Debian Stable. For me this is old enough, so unless convinced otherwise, I'll gradually start using for test suite only for test suite only deps. As a seperate issue, the packaging needs to be updated not to run the test suite when DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck. d