Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:19:25 -0800
From: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] nmbug-status: Python-3-compabitility and general
	refactoring
Message-ID: <20140208221925.GD17142@odin.tremily.us>
References: <m2fvnywsly.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<m2fvnxvc2q.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<20140205152738.GJ14197@odin.tremily.us>
	<m28utp6ugv.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<20140206181400.GP14197@odin.tremily.us>
	<87ob2hogkr.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<20140208171617.GD14197@odin.tremily.us>
	<m2eh3dsbje.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<20140208190923.GE14197@odin.tremily.us>
	<m27g95s8e0.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m27g95s8e0.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
OpenPGP: id=39A2F3FA2AB17E5D8764F388FC29BDCDF15F5BE8;
	url=http://tremily.us/pubkey.txt
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list


--HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 09:37:43PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:29:41PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 08 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 09:54:28AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> >> >> More importantly some of the threads are run together: e.g.=20
> >> >>=20
> >> >> id:"4eddf2b1.4288980a.0b74.5557@mx.google.com" and
> >> >> id:"E1RYMYd-0003wu-Ea@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de"
> >> >
> >> > Both of those messages are part of the same thread
> >> > (thread:000000000000eaab on my box, but I doubt thread IDs are
> >> > portable), so I don't add a thread-separating space between them.
> >> > Would you like more message-separating space even between messages
> >> > in the same thread?
> >>=20
> >> =E2=80=A6
> >>=20
> >> I think the more space does not fix anything but it might help
> >> regognizing message boundaries a bit (and thus would be a nice
> >> feature).
> >
> > Added to my example and nmbug-status-python3 branch.  I'm using CSS
> > for this new spacing, so non-CSS browsers (e.g. w3m) won't render the
> > inter-message spacing.  I think the colored-link (second message row)
> > vs. default id (first message row) makes inter-message separation
> > clear enough in that case.
>=20
> The 2 0.5em:s adds up to 1em between messages and that IMHO makes the
> messages be too far apart from each other. I changed the padding-top
> and padding-bottom values to 0.25em which IMHO is better...

0.25em works for me.  Branch and example updated.

Cheers,
Trevor

--=20
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

--HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=G2Uy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--HWvPVVuAAfuRc6SZ--