Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9604B6DE1104 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 21:11:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.249 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.147, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id deBR8q9eDCDu for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 21:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01D56DE09ED for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 21:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBEC100046; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:11:19 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: make modifications to message Fcc vars buffer-local In-Reply-To: <874mkcw318.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <87fv4093sl.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <1438718659-11522-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1438718659-11522-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <874mkcw318.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+54~g0bf3ee6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 04:11:37 -0000 On Thu, Aug 06 2015, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > >> >> One thing come to my mind: would it be possible to use buffer-local >> variable message-fcc-handler-function in notmuch-message-mode buffers so >> that such wrapper functions defined below would not be needed. i.e. >> >> (make-local-variable 'message-fcc-handler-function) >> (setq message-fcc-handler-function #'notmuch-fcc-handler) >> > > This was my first approach, and I actually filed > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=21174 > > about why it doesn't work. > > Great minds think alike / Fools seldom differ, as they say ;) Uh ;/ You could add some note about buffer-local variables not applicable in this context for future archeologists to understand ;) -- either in commit message or in comment.. > > d Tomi