Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB7C431FB6 for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:14:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hoTWCwMY2mr for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450FF431FAF for ; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B751000B3; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 10:14:24 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] NEWS: mention the change in default build flags In-Reply-To: <87oatn9k5x.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <1412488408-25699-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87oatn9k5x.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+130~ga61922f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 07:14:52 -0000 On Wed, Oct 08 2014, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > >> On Sun, Oct 05 2014, David Bremner wrote: >> >>> It blows things up by a factor of six or so, so it's worth giving >>> people a heads up. It won't effect e.g. Debian, that already builds >>> with -g and then strips. >> >> Maybe SomeOne(=E2=84=A2) could make a patch that strip(1)s at make insta= ll time ? >> >> Tomi > > OK, but according to=20 > > https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html > > (which I defer to when it's convenient and agrees with me ;)=20 > > it should be in a seperate install-strip target Fine. I think this situation os tolerable (i.e. we presumable do not have=20 install-strip target done (just yet)) So, patch LGTM. > > d Tomi