Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403DF431FB6 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qIssMC8Bo9hJ for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE4A3431FAF for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkat2 with SMTP id t2so4923084bka.26 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=KsE0wo0GVateuB2/NEQMDcNN5LubiT1SSXy4tM+Pe2M=; b=KQCEmqlnkFwdObDXHMRKDxiKflxVGbUJVtgA6zPISIYHS4NAQjAWrfZWiW22+W7mjI U+uYeHTuK7TOsHly5c4+SkNITtteXM/sCqPXVfH9HpQ6rRo/PLWXtv1Donn0axHrpxaB F/cv7KvVaBiGIM2Egpcg1ivom8D9IQUxPZjw0= Received: by 10.204.152.219 with SMTP id h27mr5254508bkw.75.1326737229467; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ig13sm8946539bkc.9.2012.01.16.10.07.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:07:08 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Kurochkin To: David Bremner , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address scanning functions In-Reply-To: <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+68~gab6495e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400 Message-ID: <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:07:11 -0000 Hello. Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this change is a pain. From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone here. There was a proposal to change reply bindings to 'ra' and 'rs'. When 'r' is pressed an appropriate help message can be given in the minibuffer. I like this proposal. What do others think? If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new ones are implemented? Regards, Dmitry