Return-Path: <jason@jasonjgw.net>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B2F4196F4
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  6 Apr 2010 17:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.682
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.682 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982] autolearn=no
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id bmWRc+wZ3Com for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue,  6 Apr 2010 17:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jdc.jasonjgw.net (ppp121-45-190-215.lns6.syd7.internode.on.net
	[121.45.190.215])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D144196F0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  6 Apr 2010 17:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by jdc.jasonjgw.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C4EE41812029F; Wed,  7 Apr 2010 10:26:22 +1000 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=jasonjgw.net; s=mail;
	t=1270599982; bh=g0wMIHkRangIEo9gc5PNtTxl2HEYuuUwZGG+4iI7KYg=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=FeLLN0HXrhMVE8YtB8RLFh2Ucu56U5z3lJDwMwa7/ilRhvNHw2ppHED3JvkshVIvQ
	pb3sDgf+BYdnpuBEf74XToR8te2OB+gNyij1sAj+SrKttr/wNd7YFvQeG6CERcKcpZ
	M97Nc2AK5E1rsqsIlEuKv0WYX+gb+MydBHeGUsjs=
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:26:22 +1000
From: Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
To: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] Message parsing issue?
Message-ID: <20100407002622.GA10289@jdc.jasonjgw.net>
References: <20100403072540.GA15606@jdc.jasonjgw.net>
	<87fx384wp9.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fx384wp9.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:26:25 -0000

David Bremner <bremner@unb.ca> wrote:
 
> One thing I noticed was that the message you sent (at least, if I got
> the correct attachment), had X-Spam headers _before_ the "From "
> line. If I remove those headers then the message displays Ok.  It is
> probably not worth putting too much effort into that display code since
> it is in the process of being completely rewritten. Perhaps an extra
> pass through "formail" can format you message headers a bit more nicely?

I noticed this as well. I hope the new display code in Notmuch will be able to
handle such cases, unless there are good reasons not to do so.