Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10402431FB6 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:13:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FfPY9HbvKO53 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:13:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C93A431FAE for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:13:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WE8Hh-0001mV-Hx; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:13:45 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 22369 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:13:42 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] nmbug-status: Add inter-message padding In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+53~g3e1d7f6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:13:42 -0400 Message-ID: <87ppmq1lwp.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Tomi Ollila X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:13:56 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > We already had the tbody with a blank row separating threads (which is > not colored); this commit adds a bit of spacing to separate messages > within a thread. It will also add a bit of colored padding above the > first message and below the final message, but the main goal is to add > padding *between* two-row message blocks. I tested patches 1-6, but my fix for patch 4 broke patch 7. So maybe it's best if you regenerate the series. The concept of the last two patches seems OK. d