Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42576DE1B2E for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.377, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8m4wpxN10yDz for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com (mail-ob0-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DADC6DE1B2C for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so66829142obb.1 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=l0lMVYsW5Fb9WxSpbCuAo3EUAIeIeIGK5faO7IQtE3I=; b=z6y/fjxoS45cXI6aLsfLqlZKepUapAYuvk7w+SgO4QcUbwLqPgWIm4z7NazbM2y0av amrJuIEVrHyOCqlNqZAkqUUr1no9Hp8oNQuhxmy+7Ka9LgQYC1SI2TPSb3Mc4H7Fu5eu 75Kzpaw9Q7NMi9fKnrb9CAbGab9IjxWDHCye0e3D5NZqAXg4aXciADvAN8auNLwj+m7E 7YF7wU4mVQwOm+4mIWekRJ6sxwkqbe/I/gphmbMa47txVP9YjaQ56pl0GgKcboYQY/dM 8pApEU6VRMxtY1oWZbrkNon2dNk+ZzoykQDS6IMuPZEUnne3dIE30WRTKYT0GZ3nnpst fCgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.158.164 with SMTP id wv4mr9403505obb.78.1442759638163; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.212.204 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:33:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87fv2a4ctt.fsf@zancas.localnet> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 10:33:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible some threads are not complete due to bug? From: Xu Wang To: David Bremner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 14:34:01 -0000 On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:02 PM, David Bremner wrote: > Xu Wang writes: > >> Sometimes I need to do: >> >> $ notmuch search --output=threads "id:MYMSGID" >> thread:000000000000a125 >> $ notmuch search --output=messages "thread:000000000000a125" >> >> In theory, this should output the message that responded to message ID >> "MYMSGID". Sometimes it works. But sometimes it does not work. That >> is, there exists an email where I am sure (I checked the raw email) >> that there is a header >> In-Reply-To: >> but that email does not show when I do the two commands above. > > I'm not 100% sure what you mean by "does not show". Do you mean that the > output from the second command is empty? or does not contain MYMSGID? That was poor formatting on my part. It only was outputting the id I put into the first command. So it only showed id:MYMSGID >> Indeed, that mail belongs to a different thread ID. > > How can you tell that the mail belongs to a different thread? Because when I do a notmuch search for that message by message ID with --output=threads, it gives a different thread ID. > Isn't that what your first command tells you? Well yes, but I wanted to confirm that that is indeed the reason. I have heard in someone saying that debugging is process of confirming things that should be true. Kind regards, Xu