Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A9B431FBD
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 May 2014 15:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id IvC8gQgHIkfe for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu,  1 May 2014 15:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com (mail-ob0-f178.google.com
	[209.85.214.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9971B431FAF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu,  1 May 2014 15:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id va2so1040510obc.37
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 01 May 2014 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=l01SbJ7Xs8+3AvbqwG6yvxsXmt152wGSmcphIHWV4pc=;
	b=FWclwMIUXlF1Y5PCWiEYK1cNTOUyj0gEm5i5wTXjrwFr04aSuRcoB9lB5d1xlGO0EQ
	Rrti6SmOb5DgAyW+epfjwC/HUiPWz6SNKne6EAwuWFYvE/c5IaJ8XZNJEQQNwt4uBYMM
	CCvcKuV40rc0z51xVItqpCJPey3QHZYLAQxICLpO+W900ACecCfw9ZN6lLUb2jiUMkdX
	SoM0rMAw7O8SmEMHLTWRXv95WvUtWSskjGITaC+pkR6rEyPFbEjiZHNGYK5EdpAfqflF
	GY6UzGeYCYDHlsj2Ia27ZEMEtrgdgHG/EdJD6JEsGYP6V1p3sXaFoFQfwqAcdqR2zrhC
	0FTw==
X-Received: by 10.60.74.195 with SMTP id w3mr13577944oev.28.1398984858010;
	Thu, 01 May 2014 15:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f1sm122156535oej.5.2014.05.01.15.54.15
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Thu, 01 May 2014 15:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 17:43:39 -0500
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, 
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Message-ID: <5362ce1b9dba0_569a13852ecab@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <m2lhul2skx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
References: <1398899916-18352-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
	<5361893877282_39b4d8330851@nysa.notmuch>
	<m2lhul2skx.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
Subject: RE: Final call for news for 0.18
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 22:54:26 -0000

Tomi Ollila wrote:
> In general these patches:
> 
> id:1398289784-18203-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com
> id:1398289784-18203-3-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com
> id:1398289784-18203-4-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com
> 
> has something lacking in the commit messages; none of these indicate that
> these are vim patches in the subject line.

Agh, I ported them from my standalone repo and forgot to do that.

> Also NEWS for these changes are missing.

Shouldn't the NEWS be written by the maintainers? In fact, aren't they
the ones that decide if something is worth mentioning in the NEWS or
not?

> I personally don't see these patches being important enough to hinder
> 0.18 release timeline --

Well, if your mails had ever been rejected from vger.kernel.org because
of the format you might see that.

> these patches should just have come earlier...

Yes.

> ... but if you had a good case, fix these things (quickly!) and had
> strong backing from some other notmuch-vim users I could see a small
> chance of these being part of the next release...

All right.

> PS: does vim frontend lack id:message-id feature --

What feature?

-- 
Felipe Contreras