Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ECE431FAF for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:23:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fTAMlJCSxLMQ for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-7.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.36]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79826431FAE for ; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:23:55 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074424-b7fae6d000000906-6a-4fa1d01aa58e Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id CC.B2.02310.A10D1AF4; Wed, 2 May 2012 20:23:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q430NriG027903; Wed, 2 May 2012 20:23:54 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q430Npl6004860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 May 2012 20:23:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPjpn-0006wx-F5; Wed, 02 May 2012 20:23:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 20:23:51 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Make notmuch_database_{open, create} return status codes Message-ID: <20120503002351.GZ2704@mit.edu> References: <1335651473-19652-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1335803138-24024-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT15W6sNDf4PoUE4vrN2cyW7xZOY/V gcnj8NeFLB7PVt1iDmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mr4dPs+e8Ek9oo9XRYNjAdYuxg5OSQETCTa m/cwQthiEhfurWfrYuTiEBLYxygxd+YXdghnPaPE6VszmEGqhAROMEkceVUAkVjCKHF8wVqg URwcLAIqEttfuoHUsAloSGzbvxxsqghQ+EHberBtzALSEt9+NzOBlAsLhEkc3MIBEuYV0JZY 9nsC1K65jBLNZ34yQyQEJU7OfMIC0aslcePfS7BekDnL/4H1cgoYSCy9tJcdxBYFWjXl5Da2 CYxCs5B0z0LSPQuhewEj8ypG2ZTcKt3cxMyc4tRk3eLkxLy81CJdc73czBK91JTSTYzgkHZR 2cHYfEjpEKMAB6MSDy9z1EJ/IdbEsuLK3EOMkhxMSqK8804AhfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNSiw8x SnAwK4nwqrUB5XhTEiurUovyYVLSHCxK4rwaWu/8hATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLIyHBxKErxl54Ea BYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIMN5gIangtTwFhck5hZnpkPkTzEqSonzeoEkBEASGaV5cL2wlPOK URzoFWHedJAqHmC6gut+BTSYCWhwvvk8kMEliQgpqQZGozuxzsGN7513h/Uwmn9n+L6e+/Cu K63Tg0t2ndskv7bs2O3WBx99rG8arEsU0QwseJ11sYyNS+f0R443s3+6hkqyPfxq5nym0zNz zqz4tgk71U9t0nz/52mc3wMP2X82RZMlrI+Vyax4d+eM23ndAJ76n1c9519RU7x0WrShxmXH pkkLbhSUKbEUZyQaajEXFScCAJIz8gkUAwAA Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 00:23:57 -0000 Quoth Tomi Ollila on May 02 at 10:08 pm: > On Mon, Apr 30 2012, Austin Clements wrote: > > > Relative to v1, this makes notmuch_database_open and > > notmuch_database_create gracefully handle a NULL out-argument and adds > > documentation of the possible error return values from these two > > functions. Patches 3 and on have not changed. > > LGTM. > > One question though: > > In bindings/python/notmuch/database.py class Database functions > create() and open() have the following last lines: > > + if status != STATUS.SUCCESS: > + raise NotmuchError(status) > + self._db = db > + return status > > What is the point returning 'status' in the only case the > value is STATUS.SUCCESS -- is some caller interested on this ? This was for consistency with other methods (e.g., begin_atomic also only ever returns STATUS.SUCCESS).