DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	b=V2leW0b8fdPxIoigEOYydLlMzPW6zf/dXK2pxgws+ar99ZIHmCXoHHpyqwn9CShGA4
	FHHZojTMAntbZR7pPMNIwVNjoHTkA5aObIYj7Px3zrkFPVl3/qOfIfZdEVLcuN2//r91
	k+1202I0W2rYmwfqyLLHInt+g+AAafCNo/oRw=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87vd4hs0pu.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
References: <AANLkTik=5Jmemo089b813s2QwZrceATmV-mHanasGAT3@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vd4hs0pu.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
From: Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chm.duquesne@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:44:38 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=dBWm0_KOp5DudT4juMkW2NJLknK3ch=YvKp1h@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: I've begun to write notmuch-ncurse.py
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 01:11:47 +0100, Christophe-Marie Duquesne <chm.duquesne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Very cool. Not wanting to promote my own things, but is there a reason
> you use the notmuch binary and parse that output rather than using the
> python bindings that come included with notmuch?

I was simply not aware of this binding... Reading your api, I could
not find out if the queries were ran asynchronously. Is it possible?
If so, that would indeed be worth giving it a try.

Meanwhile, as a matter of personal taste, I must say I like more
having processes communicating through pipes and raw text, unix-style,
than using bindings. So I think I'll switch only if I get a
significant reduction of the complexity of the code in exchange.

Best regards,
Christophe-Marie