Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FD7429E25 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dlz5Q1B62Wo8 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4712431FB6 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492672E50A1B for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:00:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (gwave-223.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.114.223]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCD9328030 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 210D49C1; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:00:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Notmuch Mail Subject: decryption error for signed+encrypted messages User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+39~g74c9dba (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:00:19 -0700 Message-ID: <87obwrix8s.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:00:26 -0000 --=-=-= I just wanted to note on-list that I've run into what I think is a GMIME bug having to do with encrypted messages. I think this has been mentioned on IRC, but I wanted to document it here (so that we can tag it with our new bug tracker!). Decryption of messages that are both signed and encrypted seems to fail if the signers key is not present in the users keyring. I don't see any reason why decryption should fail, since it shouldn't have anything to do with the signer. The message should decrypt, and there should only be a signature verification error. I haven't checked to see if this has been reported upstream or not. I'll try to look into it. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOtCgzAAoJEO00zqvie6q89dMQAK5VSFyNc25tpGgPEOmgkPRc 3r0aqutPBhTAxRLFMkf0QHIVh3BcAcVn0AlOTmq2eaUtZVF9vV7Z9DskP5Rjt5Gp TsGGWOr4kecFJHOspOFWF8roJ5uys0NCyY7hw0BkXyjd5AZCDsIHBVCBZd74HPC8 kVEP7VSuTCaudPfzs9yejo8uy5DCT8dIQeZtgQSRKOI8d3NOdqEMSZz99MjQYUom LteHJ1Cg7Fw2PIyB9ZpWbP+pF2ErundCr0jO5arA+G0qeJ4XKQDpUpS2Wr+eA3DP CyrhXh1RmdokmaaChHHHsxLhRJe0yyl+yDZvIsmqbKtnIhP3NMo9Mf9FKr7yLEmU NTnuT6wiDlpDRjifsxvHw2t6Uae/2TeCEza87IR/S5j/OXVksfRcEWVJg2cywGQe /INXa3JPH6pVvkyA0LPI/X4mpMCJKANkGjClWBTNHQI4tq4/GJCqWLLfIa0HN+P4 f4tjBBgFSzvN73yljjNHelsIJpH3gWHVE9cw1TzYht1oru60GBRA5dvh2irB2sI0 Uz72bfChq0iJwE9DqCVJ94nWAjAlPZ7kW90YMqDH62zoyhJVbUhClk1qyxvURsO8 d70VD2yERUHTG0QD4+c6NkiZFVn4tGFDHjIWTlXWaSedEd5qib5mBIuSwZzA314x djLKJPbhDA3LDss6Jdav =8cZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--