Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E43431FBD for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:09:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iR+HITrWAZgW for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:09:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.148]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33303431FAE for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:09:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so289423qwc.32 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:09:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:cc:subject:from :to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:user-agent :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Ap1gzACVY7DCBbUhM7d8kXr4+8xdt1Y7D3muriQ28E=; b=R9zadrGeDuZI1CS38RqQhCWRxoiqWMiL9AxkboZ4MvdMzoWQZBGBCqJHzF8z7KEC2/ 4zWCh0VMSccrhjAl5IoQRSo4/25maWF3wz6iQcePrKBmivYTulhLTMjRA4p2UKbVlrWd vnpmojp2SpH8CttXflkpVVc0JUr33q+5Izt6I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:cc:subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding; b=BbaJmNfj1j9KcdZ/kx31wGiEmlIuFUAGSm7e5I3Q0u2hMm7lWoJfUK25Dim1q/p2ZM el8giaomCDw6OkARxtHaG1Cf+/S5/zm++2ZsyLvsZ9dQwcOoymck/1b5ZvItJY0t+Rc7 zW0L+AtsjMFgWenMfUjaUUj/ZlvC+u9BvtdDE= Received: by 10.224.73.36 with SMTP id o36mr2814428qaj.369.1263614961755; Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:09:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (pool-74-106-64-24.spfdma.east.verizon.net [74.106.64.24]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm2344212qyk.6.2010.01.15.20.09.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:09:20 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Ben Gamari To: Carl Worth In-reply-to: <1262172831-sup-3645@lisa> References: <1262078148-sup-7891@ben-laptop> <20091230115223.1b3472a1@hikari> <1262172831-sup-3645@lisa> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:09:18 -0500 Message-Id: <1263610606-sup-9677@ben-laptop> User-Agent: Sup/git Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: notmuch Subject: Re: [notmuch] SWIG (and particularly Python) bindings X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:09:23 -0000 Excerpts from Scott Robinson's message of Wed Dec 30 06:34:15 -0500 2009: > Excerpts from Adrian Perez de Castro's message of Wed Dec 30 02:52:23 -0800 2009: > > BTW, I think that if more bindings start to appear, Notmuch might be built > > as a shared library, to avoid duplicating it everywhere. One option may be > > using *just* libtool but not the rest of auto-foo tools (for the record: > > I agree with Carl that they are slow and wicked). > > http://github.com/quad/notmuch/tree/libtool Is this branch being considered for merge? The build output arguably isn't as pretty as it was before, but it seems to work. Moreover, my SWIG patches currently depend upon having a shared library involved. - Ben