Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BD3431FBC for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id diWVrAI+kXrd for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45176431FAE for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 09:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yhp26 with SMTP id 26so1319813yhp.26 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=AV6ny/Lw2fys160KvroD2O0V3al0U0VsVxvAk6QwC9E=; b=eAYdDUoojAWpGvMYWnCAEJOed8IpENWHvWpHS8U8d/Ut1DLCW0tFsVBnlFs6FK89JL Yxcdml3MWRqnvR7H+yKUI3nQpL/Gv3+w+It8ew2XO5vSLAkFBWzyzKgwY6ZP7UlQzHTX lGysOiOnAqQYS3FIV9enENC6/oc6G+Ev1mtRe2QypLqFrWKFK6Za9kXewHCcm3UoLgit MBILJod2EUGuNb2w2my+q6OZrL3T4LLB2b2kJ7JjdK7N532I+PoS8iWRkl0FZf7bahYd kG+5/AdxjIb9Z72iOKenk7698dXU0hRutHnT9TH0StkGThWMmNiCbviwi1q4ZjRUfWZF tLHA== Received: by 10.50.208.8 with SMTP id ma8mr4521552igc.41.1344012863837; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cl-512.phx-01.us.sixxs.net. [2001:1938:81:1ff::2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l19sm15236194iga.10.2012.08.03.09.54.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Svend Sorensen To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Bug (?) difference 24.1 and 23.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.1.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 09:54:19 -0700 Message-ID: <87ipcz9aro.fsf@ciffer.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl7iKWETiOBB3+4+rrHwvi2TatKXv8R4GC6lZ4I5ARjn9Dbozm7lJRSrlbOaqhFGVM/Ax9i X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:54:26 -0000 Robert Horn writes: > I didn't find a reference to this bug, but before digging in deeper I'll > ask if this is a duplicate. When viewing the same email message using > emacs 24.1 and 23.3.1 I get an error in 24.1. > > The error is: > mm-inline-text-html: Symbol's value as variable is void: > gnus-inhibit-images > > Notmuch is version 0.13 from the distribution tar file. > > The email has both text/plain and text/html. Old 23.3.1 color codes the > text/plain links, and kind of renders the html. New 24.1 does not color > code the text, only displays [ text/html ], and none of the html > contents. Many of the notmuch view commands fail, but "q" works and > mail can be skipped. > > It looks like a missing dependency of some sort to me, or may some > functions got renamed. I was also getting an error about gnus-inhibit-images when running emacs 24. Adding (require 'gnus-art) to my emacs config fixed the problem. http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/008405.html Svend