Return-Path: <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C2A4196F2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 3vrjsTVVijfg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com
	[208.97.132.145])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239CE431FC1
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sspaeth.de (unknown [195.190.188.219])
	by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ADD4130006C; 
	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
	Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:53:58 +0200
From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
To: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>,
	Servilio Afre Puentes <servilio@gmail.com>,
	notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: when archiving move the cursor depending on the
	sort order.
In-Reply-To: <874ojea0tn.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
References: <x2wb22065d01004130604j5f71d3c4g191d9eb4109c324@mail.gmail.com>
	<874ojea0tn.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:53:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87iq7u9x6y.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
User-Agent: notmuch version 0.1-107-g553feae (Emacs
 23.1.1/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:54:04 -0000

On 2010-04-14, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Servilio Afre Puentes wrote:
> > The current hardcoded behaviour will not take you to the next unread
> > thread when the sort order is set to newer-first from the default of
> > older-first.
> 
> Is this really what we want? If I sort messages by newest first, it
> menas that I want to process my emails from the newest to the oldest.
> I'm satisfied with the current behavour.

Agreed, I would be very surprised to get a different behavior.