Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6E9431FD0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:47:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32aXQZ07uqFT for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com (mail-ww0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5E9431FB6 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:47:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so2239245wgb.2 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.77.228 with SMTP id v4mr32810977wiw.8.1326181650422; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:47:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p2sm82201820wbh.22.2012.01.09.23.47.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:47:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 30000) id 3FD2FA07BB; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:27 +0000 (GMT) To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: another attempt to add delete functionality in emacs In-Reply-To: <1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> References: <1325975294-646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+151~gbf1dc2b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:23 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:47:32 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 14:28:10 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > I try to address the concerns that have come up in previous attempts. > In particular, I include a patch that creates a new customization > variable, notmuch-search-exclude-deleted, that will exclude any > messages with the "deleted" tag from searches. This actually makes > "deleted" messages appear effectively deleted, which is one of the > things cworth wanted to see, and one of the reasons he kept pushing > back on previous attempts at this functionality. I honestly don't understand the reason for this. If someone wants to not see messages that they have tagged as 'deleted', they add 'and not tag:deleted' to the end of the search expression. The messages aren't actually deleted because they have the 'deleted' tag, so why would they not be shown? If it's really intended that those messages not be shown then perhaps the tag should be called 'not-shown' or something. > Also, no tags other than "deleted" are modified. All tags should be > orthogonal, and should be handled so. +1 The name 'deleted' for the tag should be a configuration option, as a non-English speaker (for example) might want to use something else. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8L7QsACgkQaezQq/BJZRbVDwCfcyI4vGmH5rP1yCB+qYZrULPG aXoAn3MaGKDMBwo0ppY9Zd7P4cAhF9V/ =eWxQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--