To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
From: Rainer M Krug <R.M.Krug@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: gmail label support in offlineimap - update
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:59:18 +0100
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <50B723E6.8000108@gmail.com>
References: <50B62409.7050706@gmail.com>
	<CA+eQo_0wOSjHoMK30_PwGZonBNbSDCRy+ghX-TnimfZp++8cBg@mail.gmail.com>
	<xa1tlidllg2v.fsf@mina86.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <xa1tlidllg2v.fsf@mina86.com>
Cc: Jeremy Nickurak <public-not-much-kexSNQTsIoD754YsiR0rpA@plane.gmane.org>,
	notmuch <public-notmuch-gxuj+Tv9EO5zyzON3hdc1g@plane.gmane.org>
Precedence: list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 28/11/12 19:47, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28 2012, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
>> The other direction sounds like it would be trickier though, since there's no obvious way to
>> say "what notmuch tags have changed since time X?". Is this something that notmuch could
>> provide?
> 
> One could parse the X-Labels header and compare it with actual tags given message has.  If
> there are some tags that X-Labels lists but the message does not have, the notmuch->gmail
> syncing tool could assume that those were removed by notmuch.  Similarly with tags that are not
> in X-Labels but the message has.  (Of course the list of tags would have to be limited to those
> that have corresponding gmail labels.)  Just a thought.

Assumptions are dangerous - what about labels added on gmail side?

Rainer


> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlC3I+UACgkQoYgNqgF2egoUbACfdwBclerun3dypzmUHijh4rkn
DvcAn1chRuFiy0JKuB7GjM1aMC7YOyts
=vegN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----