Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104E76DE1994 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:48:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.250, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vvsqGqQInqhQ for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:47:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz (max.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.36]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8611C6DE1992 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 08:47:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.200.7]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD59F19F48F1 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:47:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: IMAP STYX AMAVIS Received: from max.feld.cvut.cz ([192.168.200.1]) by localhost (styx.feld.cvut.cz [192.168.200.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10044) with ESMTP id go6-gcb1kNLk for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:47:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap.feld.cvut.cz (imap.feld.cvut.cz [147.32.192.34]) by max.feld.cvut.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC6B19F4167 for ; Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:47:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from wsh by steelpick.2x.cz with local (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aFPLM-0007BB-50 for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:47:52 +0100 From: Michal Sojka To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: notmuch-message-mode initialization follow-up Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2016 17:47:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1451753265-26713-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.4 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:48:01 -0000 Hi, the first patch fixes the problem reported in id:87wprt2r4f.fsf@zancas.localnet. Patch 2/3 is just refactoring. Patch 3/3 is reaction to id:87y4cc3qse.fsf@zancas.localnet; I'm not sure whether it addresses exactly what David had in mind, but IMHO it is an improvement. Cheers. -Michal